boring and obvious take, but i find AI stuff only interesting when it fails in hilarious or dangerous ways, and i find grifters and snake-oil salesmen fascinating in a crime-drama kind of way. i'll never respect AI output as a creative work because it's just random machine garbage and i'm only interested in real people's art and struggles, because i can emotionally connect only to real people, i mean that is why we do art, writing, film, games etc, not to look at machine kitsch
Discussion
Loading...
@mntmn AI doesn't judge you for your art. AI doesn't censor you (unless a human interferes and tries to make it do so). AI engages in collaborative writing and art regardless of genre, style or content. It could be argued AI is just a mirror for the creator in which case arguing AI doesn't "create" anything makes no sense as you don't get a reflection without there being something there to reflect.
@mntmn i agree. i have been pondering on the possible future dystopian society we could be moving towards with ai and am not looking forward to the loss of important, creative careers that give fulfillment. there is also the real danger of loss of stimulating jobs for people who are special needs and can’t perform highly at positions requiring more ability than a machine
@mntmn basically the only utility i found for it is "stuff so mind-numbingly boring i don't want to do it myself, but sufficiently compact that i am willing to check the result thoroughly" which is a sliver of activities so thin i can probably count on two hands every time when a situation like that has arisen
_so_ not worth the ... everything.