Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • About Bonfire
Furthering
@Furthering@convo.casa  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

I got a lot out of Loretta J. Ross's book Calling in.

Calling in is an alternative to calling out. She says, "Calling in considers whether we can connect with others before we start shouting them down. It allows us to reach other people as people, to breathe a little easier, and, ultimately, to get things done. Calling in builds bridges instead of burning them down so that we might walk together along the path toward collective liberation."

And while calling out is appropriate at times (Ross explains when this may be so), calling in helps us tap into love, curiosity, and connection. It's about healing divides rather than creating bigger ones.

"Calling in can help us model the world we want to achieve at the end of our efforts: a world with more joy and forgiveness and less shame and cruelty, a world where people don’t need to feel afraid and can feel empowered to pursue the common good, even if we make mistakes along the way. We can avoid the shame of not being enough, or not knowing enough."

The quotes in this thread all come from the book, and they are interspersed with my personal notes that either explain concepts or interject my reactions. I don't have page numbers for the quotes because I read a digital copy.

Maybe the ideas will resonate. Maybe you'll want to read the book. Or maybe one of the points will help you during the holiday season with family members.

1/

#Books #Reading #CallingIn #Kindness #Communication

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Furthering
@Furthering@convo.casa replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

Calling in starts with the self. A person has to be in the right emotional space to be able to call others in. For example, trauma survivors who have not adequately worked through their pain may not be able to call others in – yet. Someone who wants to try calling in should be able to first look inside and maintain their own curiosity about the person as well as approach the person as though they are good or have good intentions.

“Calling in depends on the rigorous practice of self-reflection and critical thinking. I wanted to learn how to practice empathetic accountability. Developing emotional and intellectual fitness requires entertaining contradictory thoughts at the same time, so that I can question my assumptions and generously consider other viewpoints—although remember that consideration is not necessarily agreement.”

And while calling in is about love, it’s not about skirting accountability. Rather, it’s about not putting into the world reactivity, negativity, defensiveness, or hostility.

“Another way to understand calling in is as ‘accountability culture’ or ‘survivors’ justice.’ It’s not about feeling sorry for wrongdoers but about recognizing their humanity, in the same way we protect the humanity of victims. It’s about engaging in constructive—not destructive—conflict with each other. It’s about learning together to be less judgmental, more generous, more collaborative, and more appreciative of nuance and ambiguity.”

“We can hold people accountable using love, forgiveness, and respect, giving people room to grow—because they may be capable of changing. We can say what we mean and mean what we say, but we don’t have to say it mean. That’s a choice.”

2/

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Furthering
@Furthering@convo.casa replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

Ross describes call outs as a way to juxtapose them with call ins and outlines their consequences.

“There are five predictable responses to a call out: Demonize: You turn the other person into your enemy, resorting to personal attacks on their character, intelligence, and value. Defend: You become entrenched in your perspective and insist on the primacy of your view. Dictate: You prioritize your perspective on the conflict to the exclusion of how others are experiencing it. Distract: You throw curveballs and red herrings that aren’t necessarily relevant but allow you to control the conversation. Deflect: You take no responsibility, shifting blame to others and covering your role in the conflict.”

Call outs can serve a purpose under certain circumstances, but those who are calling people out should be aware of their potential destructiveness.

“There are three critical ways in which I’ve seen call outs tip over the edge to become more destructive than constructive: (1) when calling out becomes a way of asserting ego or power, rather than a larger purpose; (2) when the harm caused by a call out outweighs the harm of the original wrong; and (3) when call outs create a stifled, fearful environment where people are reluctant to engage or get involved.”

3/

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Furthering
@Furthering@convo.casa replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

I very much appreciate the empathy she teaches us to show others who may be straying from a helpful or loving path. As someone who has had to balance their empathy because I see the harms of the world and understand that some people are behaving a certain way because they are afraid, or they are exhausted, or because they are mentally unwell and have often been shouted down for trying to see the source of the misbehavior, I was glad to see this put into words:

“If we want to help people reconsider beliefs that we believe are biased, we have to assume the best about them. We can choose to believe that they may be willing to listen to information that challenges the assumptions they’ve absorbed. We have to realize that their resistance may be a proxy for something else—a sense of being left behind, of not fitting in, of not being taken seriously, or of being bewildered or frightened by the pace of social change. We can be humble and admit we don’t know everything that led them to their beliefs. This is our chance to find out.”

This “we don’t know everything that led them to their beliefs” is so simple and true – reducing people to “bad” or “evil” is a convenient oversimplification. Of course, that doesn’t excuse bad behavior, but by understanding it (or trying to) we may be able to connect with them on a human level.

4/

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Furthering
@Furthering@convo.casa replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

She also talks about allies that may be 50% your ally or 90% your ally – being some percentage of ally is already good! And while you may want to get someone over to your side 100%, that may not be possible and in the end it can even waste time when people are trying to work towards a common goal.

Ross is great at giving examples that illustrate her points. I love the examples that are from everyday life (with friends or family) because they show how calling in is not just for activists.

“For instance, if you’re calling in a friend who keeps making insulting jokes, you might take them aside and say, ‘I know you’re a caring person. I’ve seen you go out of your way to check in with me when I’m down. I’ve seen you drop everything to help out your friends. So why is there this odd area where you’ve decided to be okay with putting other people down?’ Starting the conversation this way lets them know that you’re trying to keep your connection instead of severing it."

She offers three tips for calling in family members/friends:

1. Avoid responding directly to their words.
2. Connect with calm first.
3. Remind them of the good you see in them. Show them that you'd like to see more of that. Ask where this other side of them is coming from and how one can exist alongside the other.

5/

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Furthering
@Furthering@convo.casa replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

She also talks about cancel culture. This paragraph really made me stop and think. As someone who can barely stomach the art or literature of people who we know to have been pretty awful, I want now to consider this reaction through the lens of her words. I will probably still be selective, but that last sentence makes sense:

“We would always be canceling people retroactively if we used our modern perspectives to extract people from their pasts to judge them. This is called ‘presentism,’ where we judge the past through the lens of the present. Everything should be placed in context, not erased, as these contradictions have much to teach us. Art is not just to affirm your point of view but to make you think and sometimes wonder.”

6/

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

A small Bonfire corner on the internet

This is a small personal instance of Bonfire in the Fediverse.

A small Bonfire corner on the internet: About · Code of conduct · Privacy ·
Bonfire social · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login